Can I Sprinkle Adderall

UNIVERSITY OF RUBBLE ', RUBBLE OF DEMOCRACY, AND MIRACLES 11/29/2010

carry my speech at the university sit-in protest against the bill Gelmini, held in L'Aquila in the red zone, opposite the historic home of the Faculty of Humanities

(also published here: http://www.carta.org/articoli/19864,

and : http://www.ateneinrivolta.org/università/macerie-di-università-macerie-di- democracy)

----------------

RUBBLE:

These days Italy Civil speaks the language of the rubble. The ruins are a symbol of deprivation faced by the state. The ruins are a symbol of deception hidden propaganda, attitude to omit from the spotlight what's wrong: almost everything.

Rubble in Italy are a symbol, but the ruins are a reference to L'Aquila: L'Aquila is a reservoir of signs that tell the mechanics of a system of propaganda that is dictatorial, even if camouflaged inside semblance of democracy. For those who have eyes to see, in L'Aquila triumphalism of the government reveal a crumbling reality of subordination of the social strategies of profit. This is why L'Aquila urges Italy to revolt, from the University, because culture is a resource and an antidote to tyranny. That is why the University of L'Aquila turns.

TRICK:

Gelmini The bill is an attack on the world of education, expression of a government of deception. In fact, the bill gelmini form in the guise of reforming a reduction, destruction, feudalization a national system of education. A reform is necessary, but not this, and we can not allow such a need to become a Trojan horse to attack the school, to break down, reducing it to the bone and the service of established power. The bill Gelmini takes away resources to the world of training, the precarious, it has to privatization, not weaken the larger universities, the University brings to un'aziendalizzazione of knowledge, which inevitably will emerge in political regimentation of knowledge. And then it should be clear that meanness is a reprehensible propaganda to believe that this account of the baronies DDL is academic: baronies real academic support the Gelmini decree, as if it will pass, it will be largely reinforced.

subjection:

In a democratic state the civil society must oppose with all their strength to reduce the risk of knowing the instrument of the regime. Education is, was the means to transform his subjects into citizens, so back it opens the way to bring the masses into subservience. Oppressive regimes in the 'ignorance is strength ", we are faced with an Orwellian scenario in essence, served up with a deceptive delicacy. Dictatorships old and new - that are based on more violence or more on fiction - are afraid of knowledge. Thus, a camouflaged dictatorship disguised as democracy in the reassuring word "reform" an attack demolitive training aimed at strengthening a grammar of power that needs the allegiance.

TOLERANCE:

This system uses a systematic deception of addiction in relation to a general process of erosion of the company by profit. The public is accustomed to a strategy of stigma with which any form of civil dissent is degraded to irrationalism extremist. The worst effects of quest'assuefazione scheme is that it has produced a widespread feeling of hopelessness with respect to a possible change: today, the alienation part by induction of false consciousness that there are no really viable alternative.

ADDRESSED:

is why, also from University, it is necessary to take collective consciousness toward a cultural revolt, as well as political.

Antonello Ciccozzi

L'Aquila 11/29/2010

Strong Women Headscissors

Latest updates from Haiti: the epidemic of cholera

E 'active network Sister Marcella, Noli father, sister Anna and fathers Camilliani.

Shared Pane (which maintains Sister Anna) will send all of the deposit Tradate.

Kay (supporting Sister Marcella) has already prepared a lot of material.

father Gianfranco I just heard from the S. Camillo di Haiti.

The situation is serious and got out of hand on who should control it and prevent it.

Cholera spreads like wildfire.

Official estimates speak of 1,200 dead, but of course refer to the dead in the forest.

There is a count of all the dead who are left in open country.

2 dead at St. Camillo and 20 cholera patients under treatment.

Crescenzo Father asks us to send the following things:

-substances for oral rehydration (type Enervit / polase / etc ...)

-tablets to purify water

mattresses 1-square (not shown me the numbers: as many as possible)

What can we do?

I heard Port de Paix: the mayor will send us a report on the status of the situation.

Deaths established at the time rose to 80 in Port de Paix.

Max

E 'everything was prepared for shipment to a CONTAINER OF HUMANITARIAN AID

all the details on the site ANPIL

Volunteers

ANPIL http://anpil.blogspot.com or http://www.anpil.org

More Sensitive To Pain When On Your Period

Telemag


this is the text of the speech that I prepared for the national demonstration Eagle on 20 November 2010 "rubble of democracy"

ps.: Link to video of

http://www.youtube.com/ watch? v = t4cg5JCmR8U & feature = player_embedded

(for time I cut some way)

-------

I do mind the local question of the miracle of Aquila, but first it is best to remember two news, because they are important, and why this is a country with a fragile memory:

the first news given by the national media is that there was no earthquake, as being in front of a normal release of energy could be calm and drink a glass of Montepulciano. So they said to the media - in the middle months of continuous shock - the top civil protection under the National Commission on large exposures.

the second piece of news given by the national media is that after the earthquake that there was to be, in L'Aquila, there was literally a "reconstruction model" and this title " the paper 'a bit of months ago.

the other hand, Berlusconi himself has talked about obsessively reconstructed record, boasted in Europe. Two months ago, told the French daily "Le Figaro" these words: "We rebuilt in record time an entire city."

so big and they can shoot without restraint in an offensive way it's a miracle, and L'Aquila there have been many miracles.

The first miracle was forget over 300 victims, who would be saved if they had not had those assurances authoritative disastrous, another massacre in the Italian try to remain unpunished

Then there is the miracle that there were only more than 300 victims, who could have been 3,000 or 30,000 , because half the town stopped on the edge, and still remains suspended on the threshold of total collapse, by pure chance. Would have sufficed a few more seconds.

eagle still has the need and duty to develop a bereavement, because the removal is the antithesis of mourning, and this should be a national issue, as disastrous those assurances were a factor contributing cause of a tragedy that is not only the massacre of an earthquake there is a complicity of the state.

A miracle very substantial, which miraculously does not pay anyone, is that the same committee who gave us those assurances came the disastrous direction who has served up the project homes. We have become addicted to conflict of interest, and this is a horrendous example of conflict of interest.

So, we come to the emblem of the miracle of L'Aquila: the project is a case that miracle because, in the midst of economic crisis, through an earthquake, the hegemony of large national business groups might operate in miraculous , namely:

- with huge margins profit

- in derogation of laws

- in a nineteenth-century exploitation of masses of wage earners

Implemented with exorbitant costs, q

HIS solution gave accommodation to half of those needs, leaving a city (the real one) embalmed and producing a landscape destruction.

also hide the thousands of displaced people have miraculously healed and damage to the territory with which we deal for decades a miracle.

Another miracle was a miracle pass this criterion as a necessary, best of all, if not the only viable, while there were many possible alternative housing dramatically lower environmental impact, a lot less expensive and equally comfortable.

These solutions have optimized the performance of the social product allowing a saving of 300-400% compared to the project imposed by the civil protection, but were not selected. This is a miracle.

Another miracle is therefore arguable that L'Aquila has been spent so much money , omitting most of this money have so far ended up in pockets in L'Aquila. That is to say that - through L'Aquila - few people have stolen so much money, that the aid was used as a pretext for help.

A similar miracle is that the money to rebuild there, but since you must know how to ask, no, because it is our fault that we do not know the formula of ' "open sesame".

Then there is a miracle in L'Aquila annoying: half the town came out unscathed and strengthened by the earthquake , and while cannibalizing the wounded part, defends the captors that the politically imprisoned in the system of commissions and orders . And 'this selfishness CONCERNED THAT INTERNAL looting, which prevents a generalized revolt CITY'.

And here we must call a system of support - not only in L'Aquila, but wherever there is a disaster - get out a vision of indiscriminate damage and match the needs of retail of need, because there are earthquakes all the same, and if you do not understand that it produces social unrest.

We hunt commissioners and managers who require an external governance and use the eagle as an excuse to drain profits and direct it to groups affiliated to the government.

I go back to the original miracle, that of lies: a prime minister who shoots balls as big as a house, a large systematic deception strategy of consensus, the scheme of Show: a government tele-wizards us addicted to this and we have not understood that the times of local emergencies speak the language of the time of normal global, a world in which the reasons of profit above the one of the company, where policy is oriented economy and not the people.

In short, miracles must be understood: if they work miracles save those who receive them, but enough that they are simply told to sanctify those who would have made. This is regardless of the outcome, you can not heal well, but if you are a miracle states the birth of a healer. And a power that is based on the representation of qualities of healing power is primordially based on deception.

L'Aquila is a city in disrepair, comatose, far from being healed, and come Aquila is to discover a fraud , and this goes out from politicization and other propaganda tricks with which stigmatizes a dissent that is the only thing this unseemly civil Italian history.

L'Aquila is now a term of the national language, to which we give sense

the project homes speaks the same language as the Acerra incinerator works , the TAV, the bridge Strait: works that are more restricted to the profitability of hegemony that social well-being, works that could be avoided as they are harmful, and as socially friendly alternatives but are censored because they are less profitable.

For all this, in the need to remember we rename our Via XX Settembre in "via VI in April," and we want to ask Italy to the date of 6 April is recognized as "National Day for Disaster Prevention".

Because this country has a fragile memory, and if we lose we do not need to remember.

We must start by April 6.

Bumps Appearing Post Scabies

Pericolanti DEMOCRACIES: THE DISASTER OF CAPITALISM IN BERLIN BY THE EAGLE 11/19/2010

intervention for the national demonstration of the Eagle November 20, 2010 the "ruins of democracy", published at:

http://www.carta.org/editoriali/19851

----------------- -----

An earthquake has made the Eagle a city in danger. Not only that, today, L'Aquila is also a term of the language with which the nation is a term that has been given different meanings. Perhaps the most practiced for several months have been those of 'emergency', 'miracle', and, conversely, the 'ingratitude'. Respectively of the earthquake, the Government, of L'Aquila.

Instead come to L'Aquila open your eyes to a city crumbling in the midst of the rhapsody of plaster and concrete houses of the project. In this scenario we read a word that perhaps says much of our day, 'deception'. Deceit obvious why behind what has been sold to the public as "miracle eagle" there was no "reconstruction model" suggested by deception and legitimate doubt that the massive aid is also served as a pretext to engage broad strategies profit. Deceit hidden from the bombardment of the media propaganda of the regime. Deception, as the "miracles" are usually fiction, which fall when you stop believing.

And you can not accept the stigma of ingratitude as a threat to de-legitimize dissent. What is an Eagle through sincere, unconditional and eternal in Italy that this tragedy has been discovered in solidarity in a spirit that represents the best that can express the nation. But there is a part of the city, only for convenience one can be accused of politicizing, people who never believed in certain emergency summit of the machine, with a strong condemnation against those who have come to speculate about the catastrophe, yelling the wind of censorship and propaganda.

There is a huge question: what The project case is a fraud, because it conveyed an operation of speculation, artificially through constructive choices made in terms of ultimate or even conditio sine qua non , and implemented at costs that seem excessive. The project houses speaks the same language-emergency works such as the Acerra incinerator: taxes assessed on the basis of need not just exclusion of viable alternatives, but probably much more appropriate for the population. Instead, these choices are not charged to get the best possible social outcome, but to maximize the gains in terms political propaganda and profit. Similarly, the project houses the Eagle speaks the same language of the labor crisis: companies before the people, the economy before the society.

This is how it works-emergency codes refer to the same profit that more subtly insinuate themselves into the everyday life of ordinary times and places. The ruins are the ruins of the Eagle metaphorical point to other ruins of democracy, indicating that speculative deception was imposed to the whole world under the pretext of another collapse, that of the Berlin Wall.

We accept that the communist regimes have wrong on many points, but the deception was momentous to believe that the collapse of Soviet communism as a total positive enough to justify the modus operandi of Western capitalism. It is a device of Manichaean accuses scagionante of primordial algebra in which, by the demonization of a system, you derive the sanctification of its opposite. Thus, given the mistakes of a dictatorship that subjecting humanity to politics, there has been locked in a dictatorship the man who submits to the economy. So the West has surrendered to an economy that, by sanctifying the concept of "free market, "the company sacrificed to a policy of profit. In this direction L'Aquila today we can reveal a general principle remained hidden under the rubble of the Berlin Wall: the free-market capitalism is not only subtractive, but it is also destructive.

Let me explain with an example: a lady told me: "we can not complain if they have eaten over the houses, so goes the world, you have to eat them and give you something." This is the point of deception, the evidence of habituation to a system of mutual exchange which raises a relationship between the center of social protection and reduced to begging the counterpart of corporate parasitism large domain. When the target is reduced to one of profit maximization, the product undergoes a degeneration in relation to function: the tool degenerates into junk. The vampire who practice on the free market society is not based only on the take than give, in addition to the forgotten question of surplus value, there is the problem of placing destructive products, from apartment buildings that disfigure the landscape with nuclear power plants that threaten the future, all touted as a necessity, criticizing the alternatives. This process is carried out continuously and at all levels: from the shape of a city at odds and ends that consumerism, indifference, more and more flood the newspaper.

mind you, this is not merely a theoretical consideration, we are faced with a mechanism of production of common sense that more than two decades acting on the masses every day. Think of how many times in political specter of "communism" is still invoked to validate the dictatorship of capitalism. This is contrappassistico Manichaeism, in which the supposition that the errors of one part can mean the opposite of goodness, which has led to the development worldwide of a typology of rulers of which Berlusconi is only the most representative caricature. We are in the hands of interpreters of a cultural vision of society that has not voted on the extension of welfare, but the intensification of gains and privileges.

may seem excessive, but many times it is suspected to be inside a new Middle Ages interwoven global affiliate networks around economic powers, in a defensive position which could be prelude to extinction in the face of a all'ossimoro world, while being asked, it burns more energy and bursting with people. One has to wonder how it can last a protective response based on an idea of \u200b\u200bthe power that comes to (re) feudalization human, under a legitimate seigniorage that promising to protect from disasters and invasions, still maintains that against the nature of the masses and subordinate relationships of predation and reduced to slavery.

What is of concern is the habit of common sense to the principle of maximization of economic benefits against social ones. L'Aquila we were victims of a sort of "addiction bomber" than an ongoing earthquake swarm, and we fell into the trap of a disastrous series of assurances given by a national commission great risk. Similarly, our society is addicted to the frame of the power of the dictatorship of profit maximization, hidden behind the reassuring term 'free market'.

L'Aquila speaks the language of catastrophe, the harbinger of a world collapsing, because the site of the dark side of the established order is revealed as obscene excess in which we can decipher the signals of a crisis that is systemic. The Eagle tells us that only a re-foundation of the social pact centered on a culture can save a hope for the future invasion of profit, L'Aquila speaks of the need to design a life where politics and economics are focused on sustainable paths able to bring men back.

and thus it is clarified that this is not so much to be questioning the ethics of proposability "state of exception", risking the envelope in the pret-a-philosophical thoughts. The point is to step forward to understand and challenge the political use of the "state of exception" is being implemented by our economic system: the emergency situation, naturalizing a domain context in which the state of necessity tends to suppress the possibility of choice, there is pre-text to impose hegemony well within the power relations of post-colonial type, in which aid becomes an instrument of profit and - reflexively - the desire to profit deteriorates the form of aid. This does nothing but show in an exaggerated way what is a constitutive mechanism of capitalism, which in normal times silently erode our society vampirism for profit on the function of the product.

Today L'Aquila is a paradigmatic site, which must also give meaning to the concepts of 'deception' and 'change', explaining an awareness and a will that is compared to a normal everyday habit, and that need to be reviewed until foundations, because fundamentally unsafe. Today, L'Aquila speaks the language of the risk of a global catastrophe.

L'Aquila, 19/11/2010

Can A Queen Bed Fit In A Cargo Van U Haul

NARRATIONS ON DISASTER AND PITFALLS SCIENTIFIC-ideological, 14-9 -2010

this text contains a replica of the objections that I received as a result of my intervention on the risk of enslavement ideology of scientific institutions (the text "Earthquakes: from scientific to cultural stereotypes stupid"). The controversy has gone from the pages of "The Messenger" and abruzzo24ore.tv site, where they found all the elements, including trains:

http://www.abruzzo24ore.tv/news/Catastrofe-e-tranelli-scientifico-ideologici/18612.htm

--------------

The heated responses to my speech, by an official of the local PD (Julie Petrilli) and a director of the INGV (Warner Marzocchi), deserve a reply, and this for the sake of clarification with respect to some misunderstandings and malpractice argumentation. This states that, if the processing of data on earthquakes is ovviamene task of geologists and seismologists, the discussion of the use of the same social issue is purely socio-anthropological, especially with regard to the risk that such information is going to be the raw material for the construction of cultural stereotypes.

Petrilli If he had read carefully he found that I wrote what I think is unacceptable to attribute the damage of the earthquake only factors of poor construction. "Exclusively" means that the poor construction is a factor, but not the only one. This is the central point, and not a matter of putting "heads in the sand" (the use of this expression I am surprised, because it seems more appropriate to describe the behavior that many local politicians have adopted towards the government for more than a year). If anything, I would be careful not to throw mud on him with our own hands, carelessly importing pseudo-scientific views that reinforce stereotypes that attack us for months. The shortage in the construction of buildings is a factor, but it is both the intensity of shaking: attribute everything to the poor quality of construction is not correct.

To better understand this point it is necessary to forcefully remind them that a cardinal principle of disastrologia, which tells us that the damage was caused, in fact, the combination of the physical intensity of natural event and the elements of social vulnerability (such as For example, the quality of buildings). This shows that the principle can not be reduced the result of a cataclysm only vulnerability factors, but - conversely - these are both a necessary causal factor that determines the final damage. Clear the vulnerability of a place can be a goal to clear the asymptotic risk, but occurrence, represent in excess of this vulnerability may be a way to diminish the measurement of the physical event and download any responsibility. In a scenario in which a scientific institution produced assurances that turned out to be catastrophic in fact, I'd be very cautious on this point. Maybe someone needs to download terremotino the stereotype of a number of responsibilities. In this way, you do not want completely omit the problem of the collapse, but we want to quantitatively traced back to a more realistic view of the peculiarities of the earthquake eagle instead of the sporadic collapses we should finish the recount as if the whole city to rubble, and begin to understand that, unfortunately, the city is largely unsafe, but almost always saved us from a terrible earthquake, which, as I wrote immediately after the earthquake, caused over 300 deaths but has also saved about 100,000 live.

The Student House is a scandal, but not the whole of L'Aquila Residence Halls . If we want to avoid being subjected to the allocation stereotypes that are convenient to those who must clean conscience because it encouraged us to stay in bed, without at the same time remove the problematic elements of the social representation of the earthquake, we should be able to tell us about accepting both these elements - the intensity and vulnerability - within the collective narrative of the event. L'Aquila suffered a concussion fearing but reported sporadic collapses . In several meetings were informed by experts that has accelerated Pettino average of 0.68 G with an amplification factor of 2, and this force as shaking effective (more than 1G) ranks as the worst earthquake in the Italian event of the last 95 years. This vision is far from stereotype of the city of shacks destroyed by terremotino representation from which citizens must defend themselves, are already circulating national imagination and which can be enhanced by pseudo-scientific models which can be a comparison of the omission of the variable distance from the epicenter.

Compared to prof. Marzocchi, I repeat that I based my criticism on two points, accurate, and which sets out again for clarity, as if he wants to fight back in my view, has a duty to abide by the ethics statements that I have expressed, not manipulate the area with low referential rhetorical devices:

1) it is inappropriate to compare two earthquakes omitting the parameter of the distance from the epicenter of the sites affected earthquake

2) the non-Mercalli scale measures the intensity of the movement but the damage on buildings

Marzocchi analysis asserts that it is "wrong", it does so within a frame communication very vehement, so that would lead the reader to think that I have taken statements totally unfounded. According to this position of stern ultimatum follows that reliable Marzocchi would consider such statements as:

1) it is appropriate to compare two earthquakes omitting the parameter of the distance from the epicenter of the earthquake affected areas of

2) the Mercalli scale measures the intensity of the movement

Sure, he's done on the first point then secretly gives me reason to say that "the epicentral distance can be important." It would be nice to understand what he thinks might be important, since any model is built based the definition of variables and the definition of discovery. So Marzocchi, while blatantly offended, acknowledges that the analysis of Welsh geologist omits a variable, but it is not clear how relevant this is. I suspect that the relevance of the variable "distance" in the comparative assessment between two earthquakes is more important than the risk of distorting the comparison, giving a thumbnail of the intensity of the earthquake Aquila. This trend towards the reduction in the intensity of the earthquake Aquila was often practiced - from the magnitude - and this is confirmed by the same Marzocchi, declaring that the earthquake in Haiti would be 30 times more "great" of the Eagle, whereas the difference is 11. The habit of filing certain data in one direction is in itself a given, a worrying fact from a socio-anthropological point of view. It seems that some scientists are working out the use of the file, perhaps in view of future practical applications of this tool.

Regarding the second question, the one on the Mercalli scale, Marzocchi answer me climbing over the referent of my statement, he argues that my criticism is "wrong" only argue that this scale is "calibrated to" classify "the damage to buildings' but is also used "to produce real-time probability of damage scenarios. " The question of the intensity of movement is not even mentioned. Probably I have not heard, but I do not think a good example of that "quality of scientific information" that Marzocchi recommends.

However, I have the impression that the hassle and concern of the manager derives not so much by the value of my analysis, but the fact that my speech would follow "a year or more international criticism of the scientific world." It seems to me that the real sticking point is this. First of all I would like to point out that the criticism in question did not object generically as the "science", which I hope the manager does not should subsume in full, but most of the specific context of the quality of analysis produced by the Commission Major Hazards, which is part of the INGV. In this respect, then I would be wary of complaining about alleged "arrogance" and "offenses". This is because the impression is widespread that some opinionated nonsense cloaked in (pseudo) scientific factors but from a disastrous series of assurances, "the very real hurt of over three hundred dead. Understanding the formula disastrologia I mentioned above can help you understand that, since the damage from the disaster also necessarily depend on the social vulnerability, this factor can be possibly increased by scientists who, in certain circumstances, produce falsely reassuring message. O Marzocchi took the opportunity to give to understand that guilt was only the reporters who gave the bad press?

Here there is no space to continue, however - as I have already dealt with the issue of "assurances disastrous" - I reserve the right to go elsewhere in detail on the subject, just take some passages of the text Marzocchi now I could not discuss, but which raise serious doubts about the risks of enslavement of a (pseudo) science to political and ideological forms of control.

L'Aquila 14/9/2010

M Jak Milosc Odcinki Free

WEDNESDAY AGAINST 'November 17: STRIKE!