here is the full text that I sent on June 29, the Civil Protection (in the drafting of Abruzzo and we and the person of engineer Mauro Dolce), and for information to committees citizens, with proposals to revise the location of sites of the CASE project.
PROJECT CASE: PROPOSAL TO REVISE THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN SITES
The CASE project (that of July 2, L'Espresso called a "monster urban") has the following problems related to the location of some sites:
in several cases have been selected rural areas internal to the municipality Aquila, while the areas close to the city have not been touched, which means that many rural Aquila will be deported at the edge of town, where these areas in the landscape will be marred by condominiums, housing types that is in urban connotations.
So you might ask that the allocation of some sites, those for the CASE project in rural intra-municipal magazine is giving priority to two criteria NEAR 'and DIFFERENCE BETWEEN URBAN AND RURAL AREA: This would provide an approximation of the sites further away from the edge of the suburbs on the basis "as close as possible to the city," and the substitution with regard to rural areas inside the City, houses with wooden houses already provided by the MAP project for rural communities.
IDENTITY 'URBAN AND CONTINUITY' LANDSCAPE
The concept of "city-territory " was given by rough approximation, and this error is at the base of an isotropic view of geographical characteristics, and anthropogenic landscape of the town: it is conceivable to extend urbanity of the city of L'Aquila, this concept can not ignore that a unit planning is impossible if there is a break in the CONTINUITY 'LANDSCAPE.
This system breaks the continuity of the landscape and, nell'aquilano, embodied by the instability brought on by the mountainous land. These discontinuities imply geographic differences that affect the production of cultural identity in terms of variety, difference. If a city is unthinkable extended roughly from Preturo Bazzano, it is highly unlikely, if not impossible, an idea of \u200b\u200bwhere the city where the hills are physically separated places. Camarda, Roio Piano straw, Sassa, Collebrincioni, Arischia will never be integrated in the urban area in a full and functional: there are mountains that enclose the landscape.
For example, already the territorial scope of Pagani and Tempera, although geographically close to L'Aquila, has some cultural and historical differences (detected by differences in dialects, differences in the perception and expression of the collective self) the outcome of a historical sedimentation in which the geographical separation of the continuous flow from the mountain landscape of Bazzano is a factor of (re) production of domestic variety). Five miles of air can become when there is a mountain to make a border, a huge distance from a point of view of cultural history.
CASES ON THE PROCESS OF CHOOSING WHICH LED TO THE CURRENT SCENARIO ALLOCATED
The selection process that generated the current situation related to an active process of negotiation between the Civil Protection authorities and local institutions. Because of the need for fast set of choices, this process has seen civil society Aquila totally excluded from any possibility of review.
After reporting a series of statements of institutional actors involved in the process of choice:
Cialente:
"They decided all their [Civil Defence], I have only prevented from achieving a ' only monstrous new town. Hours we will have to undertake not to turn these neighborhoods into little ghettos. "
"requests for the identification of areas are were three: no to the New Town, located throughout the new settlements and locate them as close as possible to fractions
Bertolaso:
allocation was decided "on the basis of joint work that has been carried out by planners of the town who told us: "here you can do, here you can not do."
Bertolaso \u200b\u200bsaid that the City planners have implemented a pre-selection of sites to be protected from the CASE project, and subsequently, the remaining territory from the initial selection, the choices were made: the "here" Civil Defence was preceded by "not here" of the City.
These statements of those who have put so critical of the choices:
Anthony Perrotti:
"The choice of the areas not it just depends on hydrogeological criteria. Were spared from expropriation large lots near the center, owned by aristocrats and landed property, and that in a few years gold will be worth "a few examples:" The hectares of Coppito Lenze, already included in existing Prg as an area for building expansion and management, close to 'hospital and the university may have been saved by divine providence as the subject of a planning agreement starring banks and even ecclesiastical bodies. The small new town, are in many cases wedges of urbanization that multiply the value of surrounding lands. An example are sites Bazzano and Elijah, around which it has sought a proposal for a program of urban renewal. " According to this reading, in short, the Aquila are expelled from their city to preserve, under the ancient walls, the spaces of political maneuvering and economic reconstruction.
myself (Antonello Ciccozzi):
[in reference to calls for the identification of areas made by the Mayor] "It would perhaps have been wiser to say, locate buildings with architectural features of the urban cities as close as possible to allow Aquila to stay in all the neighboring towns, the villages for sustainable construction thinking in terms of landscape and identity. "
-----
By the way, after passing the "New Town" will overcome the risk, perhaps more, the "New Town dis-integrated", to finally arrive at an allocation made on the basis of proximity of the rings, in respect of intra-communal difference between urban and rural areas, approximated the CASE project and proposing to the city countries for the MAP project, already active for rural municipalities.
should be loudly asking that the Civil Protection is also beginning to think the allocation of modern containers to service the needs of those without housing will fall within the CASE plan, unavoidable delays to the delivery of the same (which rise in case you want to review the location of the rural sites) and the remaining approximately 20,000 people, who have not un'inagibilità E, will re-entry over the autumn
E 'highly possible that the criteria for selecting the areas have been driven by the need to preserve the urban and economic geography already sketched by PRG in 2004: have been "saved" land near the city and the economic interests linked to the State, and the Curia with business lobbies. To preserve "The Aquiletta (comparatio networks and meta-comparatio who founded and maintain traditional local powers for decades) from the consequences of the earthquake, it was decided to sacrifice quality of life of many of L'Aquila, which will have to live away from their city, and the quality of the landscape of many rural areas that are "polluted" by urban condominiums.
would ask, on behalf of the right to transparency, and I make this proposal to the committee meeting hoping to adopt, the town planners who have worked a pre-selection of land by not touching, a detailed list of such land, on the grounds of the choices.
same time would be appropriate for those who have responsibilities in this regard (I think vengno arch. Perrotti ol'urbanista Antonio Francesco Tironi), make a list of areas to be proposed on the basis of maximizing the proximity over the limits of the urban periphery, to allow, in fact, to Aquila to stay as close as possible to the city and country separate from the city by natural discontinuities (the mountains) not to be irreparably scarred.
0 comments:
Post a Comment