In these lines (published http://ilcapoluogo.com/site/News2/Attualita/Ad-reprimendam- audaciam-aquilanorum-to-Antonio-Ciccozzi and http://www.abruzzo24ore.tv/news/Bruno-Vespa-ad-reprimendam-audaciam-aquilanorum/16093.htm) I quoted a comment in the episode of Porta a Porta on April 6, 2010. For a while I decided to discontinue my participation by newspaper websites or committees, so I intend to eventually conclude the work begun in this article elsewhere.
( Part One)
BACKGROUND: The whistles AQUILANI A BERLUSCONI
What bad impression made local and national evening of the first anniversary of the earthquake eagle heavily refuted in their attempt to speculate on the solemn occasion by using it as a stage for a performance of institutional effectiveness, they find themselves punished by a spontaneous release challenge by playing the majority of citizens who have gathered together in Piazza Duomo. People have understood the City Council placed this useless: the discretion of mourning becomes an excuse to silence the citizens, and engage it on the pretense of using the anniversary to a vulgar propaganda parade of pret-a-porter administration. In revolt not only "communists" or "no global", but most of the people, "normal" people, such as wheelbarrows, and more. Then, even while reading the message from Berlusconi, the apotheosis: "whistles far exceeded the applause," so the ANSA reported. Several Italian newspapers have printed similar stories more or less diluted, and in Europe the same. Even in America realized that the Washington Post has run L'Aquila - the city hit by an earthquake and raped by a pseudo first reconstruction aimed at profit to the people - it's against the government.
be honest: given the outrage I feel I gained during this year as a pressure cooker, and I would not mind at all to throw some genuine and curse-word or cathartic, but I arrived a bit 'late, and is that the spaces around the tent was already packed. Then it was so much the people who have already did that I was breathless, as if in ecstasy, at the edge of the square to admire, once again, as happens here last few weeks, a city truly revolting. Full of people who did the casino, inside and outside the tent. Many, and too many people. An uproar of boos. How exciting. What a joy. What an ugly picture. Here are two things: either the government has speculated on the earthquake (go you know, maybe by profit and propaganda), or Aquila are ungrateful. At this point, the city rebelled, and in a world Whistles are those run by media shot [1] .
A COURT IN FIRST CLASS (AND ITS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST) \u200b\u200b
Bruno Vespa so that we can do with television, the day after has seen fit to furnish quickly an episode of his "door to door" to restore a bit 'of order, effectively hiding the title "L'Aquila when born? " [2] a process for earthquake victims dissenting. "For reprimendam audaciam aquilanorum!" Is the inscription that reminds Aquila as invaders in the sixteenth century English repressed the courageous popular rebellion against the rule: the English viceroy Don Pedro de Toledo ordered him to build a huge military fortress, but leaves the story one of the most important monuments of the Eagle. With this motto Bruno Vespa reborn degraded in the transfiguration "preferred to stay in the container?". All this to justify and defend the alleged miraculous cheoltre of infrastructure works to provide a roof that would have cost much less, fed, under the pretext of emergency, a system of profit on aid, has fulfilled a function of propaganda by the ostentation of the monumentality of the petty "new town ", and produced - because of the incompetence and corruption of local elites - a sick territoriality that will weigh on our lives for a long time. Today in the motto coined by Bruno Vespa to defend the work of the "viceroy" Bertolaso \u200b\u200band the "sovereign" Berlusconi is a question mark, because that phrase is in our case a threat that tells us to shut up and give thanks, to the bottom of our role as a strong and kind of Abruzzo, meekly enduring pain of the pillory of the stereotype of "ungrateful."
It will announce a fantastic episode for the journalist of L'Aquila, which was recently placed in the first place as "most deplorable character Berlusconi's entourage" [3] , surpassing even Emilio Fede, but now in excess of obscene and blatant bias is no longer a scandal, Vespa is still able to convince a substantial number of people be impartial, and that makes a number of well-concealed propaganda ministry. Bruno Vespa. Not one among many, but first in the crowded plateau of the courtiers of Berlusconi. The number one. Sure, you say that the ranking comes from a newspaper - the Express - which gives the impression of being deployed against our current ruler, but the result in this case raises an issue that should reflect at least the Aquila beyond influences policy through which you are trying to divide and distract them from perhaps a common value of a participatory and sustainable reconstruction.
Bruno Vespa - rich bourgeois Roman for some time - claiming origins Aquila and properties, it exhibits a membership that gives emotional participation in the drama of the earthquake. If sale is in the pathos for the reconstruction of the Eagle, and participates in the support for the government, how do you judge in a balanced way, ie (fair) away, the dissent against the government of L'Aquila? Highlight this basis it is inevitable that he, in his person, constitutively a priori and then immersed, in fact, a few years in what is customarily defined as "conflict of interests." Already have only put in half configured, in an apparent aporia, a plan of hypocrisy. Vespa claims a government that claims of economic choices, L'Aquila needs a reconstruction based on local socio-cultural priorities before on the national political and economic interests. The need for reconstruction of the city may conflict with those of economic government. If the real needs of the city are against those of the government's happening under the table of "Eastenders"? Or take a step back, the government or does the city.
And in fact for sale, as always, this time by more than an impression of being on one side, and against another, to use his position of power in the media and its alleged Aquila to support the Government in the business the so-called "earthquake d'Abruzzo", against the city, against those who live there for real, and undertakes to continue to do so. In fact, Bruno Vespa gives the impression of being a judge, one who in a container of neutral journalism camouflages some basic functions of a ministry of propaganda.
REMEDY THE MEDIA
When it takes it takes. By reducing the times in which dissent is mounting few cities in the expression of naive self-appointed representatives of "the people of the wheelbarrow," will be reached in an easy sentence of ingratitude, going to the castor oil containers.
A wheelbarrow - with lots of debris inside - is placed to make a fine show in the middle of the studio, around the object the guests, among them being the "destrissima" young Minister of Youth Giorgia Meloni. At his side, the President of the Province of Rome Nicola Zingaretti, a center-left to do as a lawyer of L'Aquila, in a democracy because we are a bit 'contradictory must be put to honor the principle of "representation of all stakeholders" [4] and then play on their handling more or less correct, and direction through time, dispensing thin tripping or praise according to the part. Not to leave unguarded the emotional part, also appear Michele Placido that speaks of Silone, and the parents of a girl victim of the earthquake. They will come after two other "earthquake" and two "experts". Finally, over the wheelbarrow, we are also studying to decorate nails and Cialente present for some time as we are accustomed to seeing them when they are dealing with people more powerful of them, the evaporated sly the first and second.
Two external links. The first has as its protagonist Guido Bertolaso, which - in large wheeled out after the recent allegations of corruption - speaks majestically from a control room, wearing the shirt of the Civil Protection; and written over a big light that leaves "work performance", not one but eight monitors lit behind him, which fill the background with images of the CASE project. It appears to the Commissioner of the granite, the "work", the "houses", the hero of emergencies that Vespa has dedicated space it deserves in other recent episodes of the program, including the "A servant of the State in the eye of judges", a valid navigation sagacity, a presentation that is already an opportunity to praise ("servant of the State") and then for a suspicion of unprovoked, violent assault ("targeted").
WHEELBARROWS shrunken
The other link is for the media movement called the "people of the wheelbarrow" or better for three citizens that a little 'naively lend themselves to act as defendants in this trap by the media in an attempt to discredit the genuine outrage of a huge part of the city. The three are in Piazza Duomo, the same place the night before the offense to the government, in the cold under the symbol of the church "Holy Souls" with them about twenty fellow citizens with the banner "truth and justice" in front of everyone with shovels and wheelbarrows, three buckets inside. A crib. Is already in place the process of shrunken barrow, a symbol of independence and revolt, a degraded element folk. "Sitting Bull at the circus, so it is said to describe a subtraction of value to people or objects through a simple operation of de-contextualization. Already now the wheelbarrow is subtly downgraded to a basin of copper dell'abruzzese "strong and gentle", marker of identity and traditional stereotypes of mountain man who, as we learned long ago, easily degenerates into understood euphemism of "peasant-owl."
With other fellow I am, just out of camera range, the edges of the media Grill ingratitude, we are immediately puzzled by this initiative. You will soon discover why this is a direct imitation of a program that will air two hours later (and where there is plenty of time to cut strong protests, which are so discouraged). It is quite clear that we will play to reduce the contents of the rambling rhetoric wheelbarrow-basin, in order to fill them with blunt ingratitude. Variously disapprove the momentum of the three that were provided to the game for sale in the way that already seems grotesquely naive, but as they say, while respecting the wishes of others, we are seeing a bit 'uneasy as it develops. Weeks of civic and historical results already threatening to finish the picture degraded to some ungrateful borghesotto that, stunned by the earthquake and probably indoctrinated by the Communists, raves sparutamente unclear invectives against the government's apparent miracle benefactor, the illusion of being able to make the worker recycling the rubble, a minority of foolish, generously and patiently listened to only paternalistic spirit of sacrifice for democracy.
The process begins. Here are the key stages. The minister responsible for Meloni begin to introduce the main axis of discrimination: when Vespa, being involved through a "we" apprehensive of involvement, the general asks if "we'll make it," she answered frankly that we have it already done because after thirteen years in Umbria a few families still live in a container. The frame is ready: first containers of Umbria, on the other houses in the fabulous duo Bertolaso-Berlusconi.
this state to the grim election santino propionate carpet for earthquake victims Aquila for provincial elections: "Umbria and Marche 1997, the Prodi government, as yet Container Family - Abruzzo 2009 the Berlusconi government, earthquake-resistant houses for families today "and then under the heading:" The government of the facts, the difference that counts! "and behind" the dignity of man and the family first. " It is rare to see a test so vulgar, degradation of law in favor. That's already sets out a window de-contextualization of the Programme: the mask of the title "L'Aquila when reborn" to go to "containers or houses," the protest or the work, "" the opinions or doing ". Various conjugations of the rough, antediluvian Manichaeism of Berlusconi's media regime camouflaged in the form of democratic legitimacy: "hatred or love."
Following a service in the old town part desert, where the eloquent concreteness of the city in ruins, an old man, one that can not be more popular, which declares happily residing in the project case (deported to 10km from the city, when it could have been built near the periphery), denigrates heavily and in no uncertain terms the events of the people of the wheelbarrow, stressing ' inability to return immediately and the hypocrisy of the claim that the debris could be shoveling concrete work (meaning than "to say everything is so easy, I would say to bring all those with wheelbarrows: Well, for one year, free, work raised ... , remove ... ta see how if the melt "). The symbolic significance of the protest, a large, which should cover a claim to autonomy in the reconstruction of participatory re-appropriation of the city is already compressed to the practical work, and what is not spoken by Bertolaso, but a senior Aquila inevitably popular (already emanating wisdom and integrity), which incorporates a concept identical to that expressed by its Bertolaso \u200b\u200bto denigrate the movement. The rite is confused with the practice, the emblem is reduced to the object.
When the word goes to the three that are variously made rashly and to elect "representatives of the people of the wheelbarrow" begins with the carousel ingenuity, and not only because no one realizes that at this point there would have to break the frame imposed by the management: the setting of carts and containers of melons mercilessly degraded by the old eagle, symbol of rebellion to index of manual labor. No, the first interviewee off balance, claiming to speak on behalf of the city, revealing not only an alleged excessive, but also lack of experience on the most basic codes of movement in relation to the fundamental question of "representativeness" (which will use the closing of sale transmission mockingly pointing out that "there is democracy when the city decides to appoint their directors). Now after the respondent announced that it has four questions, but lists only three points from a sheet confused, of which only the first is a question on non-understandable alarm, the second observation is confused, and the third a vague hope. After a presentation of the genus Vespa must have understood at once that can play cat and mouse, and asks another: "What does not convince you of this reconstruction?" For an answer hesitantly, unfocused and rhetoric about the "difference between what you think those in power and what they thought, "followed by a little vigorous complaint to the ground to take care of the houses now, and imprudent accusation for Melons not be coming to L'Aquila in person.
Now Vespa began to pursue the path of ingratitude by the stupidity stick anxiety to return home, stating that in Friuli, in Gemona: "People were put in containers and then went in hotels along the coast. No one was allowed to go in the center of Gemona to recover his house, because unfortunately there are priorities, there are stations of the cross street to be met [...]. I'm talking about where the reconstruction of Friuli was wonderful, as opposed to that of Campania. " Attention Here we see the call in case of a grid stereotypical important earthquakes in North virtuous, vicious ones to the south, and the threat to the end of L'Aquila in the "circle of the damned" with the accusation of ingratitude.
Then the challenges Meloni, who - having done a few times a hundred miles between Rome and L'Aquila - finds himself the unexpected gift of being able to argue that "risk not adequately turn the spotlight on the work that has been done. " We are the grotesque: after years of propaganda blanket over the city, after a sequence of daily pounding bridges the media and propaganda in which only processes - And even more - you could live without television cameras, after all that the minister is delivered on a silver platter the chance to say that the spotlight has not been turned enough on the miracle of L'Aquila. It can get any worse? Yes
shooting
The defining moment you open after a while, 'when the line back to square Duomo, the parade with the banner "truth and justice" have disappeared, a little 'for a cold bit 'for the first figure, and the third representative of the people taking wheelbarrows of word finding, this time successfully, that the carts "have wanted to pierce the veil on a fake miracle Aquila information is passing from one year to this city." For a moment it seems to get better. The exhibition continues a bit ', but Vespa does not accept the allegations of misrepresentation, the effectiveness of the tone is being truthful on time, so forcibly diverts the prosecution's key question of the system: "We prefer to stay in the container?". There is hesitancy in answering, you hear the other carriolante a vague and frightened, "but that way of thinking is !?!". Vespa readily grasp that the time of the sinking. The question is repeated five times among the conductor envoy, with close severity, in an act of verbal violence that reveals an obsession with interrogators. A review of the tone and manners of these "journalists" feel uncomfortable. I feel offended, many times I watch the images of this "trap" under the church of the Holy Souls, I think the canard of "representing all the parties" purports to do this here with the correct information, I see my fellow citizens, persons living in a huge drama and try to do something, as if they were deeply offended DUMB criminals. I feel sick. The respondent states the question is misplaced, but without explaining why, says he refuses to answer. The sensation of the trap is received, but not come to be streamlined and re-launched against the aggressor. In this context, the refusal to answer sounds like a surrender, is the biggest mistake. Here a conductor incorrectly can break through. And that's what happens. We are looting the semiotic, Vespa and now looks like a vulture, in a fit of frenzy growing food, pounced on carriolanti that already has housing.
It is not alone: \u200b\u200bin a climate of strong and increasing agitation, sent to seize the moment and enter also in a frenzy, asking very aggressively to another of the three, almost gettandoglisi above: "Excuse me, then what was the alternative you think ?!?". The response outlines the arguments expendable but unfortunately mixed in a hesitant and confused: "the alternative was not doing those houses, that is only the third stage, those are definitive in any way. The alternative was ... I mean, I mean, the earthquake in Friuli fifteen years now we are twenty years of difference. " Vespa interrupt inclement taxation: "trentaquatto for the truth," as if it were a point that weakens the entire speech (while if anything it would strengthen). He says "the truth", as if someone was lying. The interview continues: "The technology moves forward, there are houses that are much better than those who have made above.
Vespa then asks in a tone of paternalism that is already annoyed inquisitorial proceedings, "which has seen them?!? where they are latching ?!?", then immediately goes on the lecture's end: "in Umbria, some recent, very few, fortunately, are still in the container !!!", to continue, shouting sternly and succinctly:" I would like know in which area world there are accommodations, by an earthquake a few months, better than those that have been made in L'Aquila. Where ?!?". There is no need for the interviewee has already answered during the question, hesitant but heartfelt, and prevented the microphone volume down from the director: "Onna for example," (that is unfair to Onna Berlusconi inaugurated the houses donated by the Autonomous Region Emergency Trentino, and finished before those of the Government, Vespa celebrated farce, with the mayor of L'Aquila in transmission did not dare to reveal the fiction). You do not need. Why, even before the end of the question angrily to Vespa, the director turn up the volume on a timely applause public, therefore, between the roar of hands immediately give the tenant another vexed thrust, the coup de grace. In fact there was a surprise: "It is good that I do see the result, because it is not a clack but the Fire Department and thank them on behalf of you if you will!. Okay?!? Here !!!".
mixer and director must have done a great job of timing to raise the volume in the room, because the applause, though not many, started at the right time and were immediately generously amplified, producing a small ocean of noise. The shot goes to the minister applauding Meloni and shakes his head angrily furrowed and his mouth wide open eyes that invade the screen, then directed off close to a policeman who applauds. The ruling of ingratitude is formally announced, the shooting is done through the microphone dell'applausino simulated roar of the fire brigade, the undisputed heroes of the emergency, recycled now as moral authority and as performers of a conviction by the prosecution of the old game of L'Aquila . A severe sentence against the "clack" of carriolanti, which - last but not least - Vespa care in extreme unction to redeem the original sin, thanked the brigade for them. Earthquake ingrates!
MI MEETING IN THE MIDDLE
As I said before, I was there at the edge of the scene along with other dissenting like me - knowing that I had been dealing in detail of the matter "case / container" from now and seeing a deleterious indecision in the interviewees - highly spurred me to act in a vernacular "come on, to give screeners' na they stann'a ffa na figur'e mmerda. The call increased with increasing voltage. Many of the people orbiting sphere of active citizenship in the magma could have responded, perhaps best of three in the shooting, not because they are "good", but because they are more familiar with the matter from the outset: the case carriolanti intended that they have entered the debate post seismic-recently, and are therefore less savvy on the issue of housing types-emergency, on costs and alternatives (other than tax holiday by the Government and other containers than those of past earthquakes). These were matters of national debate until last summer.
Paradoxically, in comparison to a poor start, gl'intervistati did not go "bad" compared to being topical in content, but have succumbed to the attack because of a lack timeliness, clarity, incisiveness. This is also an element of partisanship that reveals the Vespa and makes it even more suspicious of betrayal by his proclaimed concern belonging to the fate of the city. In all ways, I see the anger over the reluctance, and I do get. Him to have to tell them so informed Bruno Vespa that there are only those houses and that there are only containers of the past? Possible? I have long known that the news, then show it. I get mad. So while the study celebrates the applause fired by fighters recruited for the occasion and discovered a surprise for the grand finale, are brought into the scene, one of the three sees me and asks me immediately to the invitation to speak.
for sale in the immediate future, more succinctly and in a loud voice: "The question is where in the world was made better, where ?!?". The sent invites me to respond, and I do it with these words: "I think this is a wrong way to communicate because you can not reduce everything to an alternative pole, ie a logic of the excluded middle. There is no question 'or accept the case or container '. The point is this: the houses have cost enormous sums, the plates earthquake was triggered as necessary, when not needed. We are building types that allow you to avoid them. " The landlord significantly lowers the tone of voice while still talking and I said: "This is an opinion, this is a different matter." I say so immediately decided, "No! It is my opinion, is not my opinion, this is a fact. "
emissions overlap. As I speak to the driver stops for a moment, bowed his head, touching his forehead with his right hand. Part of the bell transmission along with the boisterous symphony of the jingle of the symbol, the gong that appropriate masking the complaint that a systematic practice for sale at times of impasse. The conductor announces, "then, sorry, sorry, I do get two people, sorry .... Perhaps help us a moment." Invite professors Andrea Carandini and Pierluigi Nicolin, and shows promise as I call: "Now go back Victorian, quiet, quiet ... I would ask for your answer to this gentleman, just an opinion Nicolin. Now I get the impression that I put in the middle of the speech emphasizing the theme of the profit out of the need for choice, so the complaint must be in port. The dangerous drift of the profit is diverted and extinguished, thanks in part to urge resumption of other representatives of the "people of the wheelbarrow."
In fact, for the rest of the transmission to the invitation to ask me to continue the conversation was interrupted, but to no avail. Outside she Confabula connection with the headset, consult with the director, she says, "yes, yes, now I can talk to the next link", but on time avoids me, then began to tell me that my speech was "not expected" . The three wheelbarrows not exhibit any kind of coordination, and in some cases, especially now that the waters have calmed down, I think that you are there to make a race between who can get to the microphone Envoy Victorian Abate, who so choose according to his comfort. Having placed before him, ask one of them twice, which clings to "Victorian" calling her by name, kind enough to help me finish speaking, but there's to be done though the same one who claims to speak for of all citizens not to listen to shows even those who are on the side, so I find myself in competition with one that does not reveal the goodness of sacrificing an opportunity to be seen on TV.
Among the "forces of liberation Aquila," which in my opinion I also be part of the frieze, as well as overt historicizing dose of audacity, you are not immune from the usual negative effects of collectivism that varies with incidence periodically occur. I mean that in this army of leaders more or less missed short on soldiers and sometimes you discover a swarm of decongestant or whether more or less overt narcissistic disorders, delusions of grandeur, variously creeping excesses of self-esteem, the various protagonists . So after a year of various Orthodox struggles against Berlusconi and Bertolaso, suddenly I find myself wondering who is more fool: me or that what you're next. When in doubt, I give up. Blaming the institutions, with power, with the owners or if you prefer can have something that makes sweet romantic antagonism, but discover - out of grace of any elementary grammar rebel - do elbowed in this way, even among those who "Bastille" should the storm (and then in our case the 'storm the Bastille "would defend the" shack "), is pathetic and demeaning. So after a while I pull back, and I am shocked to see this circus. It's like being in a cast of some reality. If I had not imagined that I would not even drag force. But now it's done.
So while I find myself confirmed the allegation in an even thinner thanks to quest'efflorescenza with different humanity, the respondent "accredited" intervenes and makes a further gift to the opposition on sale " container-houses. " Not disrupts the polarity indicating that there are many types of homes (less expensive) containers, and many (most livable), but after continued proclamations to give the full name of the Eagle, it is assumed as an example saying that for him ' Or is his home, claiming that the gist of the problem is that the project homes was intended not only to those who will return home in fifteen years, but also to those who, like him, could have been back home long before, in three months he says.
This statement - praising the project as well as homes for the fifteen who have expectations of return for many years - Vespa gives the opportunity to announce a formal "too much grace!" For this "young man" who also had a house that did not deserve, and then immediately after the mayor slapped Cialente imputing to him the assignment of reckless homes, and then delays for reconstruction. The mayor's response to these serious allegations - the profits of reflection the redemption of the Civil Protection from any error that is sanctified by a miracle indeed even excessive - is, as always, inconsistent and often incomprehensible. No wonder that throughout the broadcast, our mayor has done passively by landfill institutional sipping any criticism of inefficiency, without the slightest opposition to the plan of sale to give all the credit to the Government and the Civil Protection and demerits to all 'local government (which has some, but not alone).
Anyway, let alone the mayor, here is the impartiality of Bruno Vespa. Some will think that it was naive of three, now more than four cats by myself, but what is staged in the critical date of the anniversary of the earthquake was a media trial against the right of the city to express disagreement with the actions of the government, shrinking a complex and articulated in debate a narrowly violent polarization "case or container". There was not just them or me, there were also thousands of people who supported the carts, but not limited to this and I understand that: there was the right of a city not to be raped by a (re) building the first devoted to the profit to the people. There was placed a stake of common sense according to which national Aquila who disagrees is ungrateful. This is not acceptable. Sunday I'm with the carts, which have many defects, but at least they love in L'Aquila.
L'Aquila, 15/04/2010
Antonello Ciccozzi
Researcher in Cultural Anthropology at the University of L'Aquila, city outraged.
the avoidance of doubt correct that are not organically linked to the so-called "people of the wheelbarrow" (I think no one is, but the media may see a different reality), or various committees (to be precise, the only committee which gave lip service is "a manifesto for the Eagle", but several months is no longer active). Participant immediately after the earthquake in the debate and post-seismic sull'Aquila practices as an element of "active citizenship", in my subjectivity as a scholar of socio-cultural themes and common feeling of my person adamantly enchanted by his city. This unpretentious to represent anyone but growing frictions in traffic junctions or discussing issues that affect us as citizens.
It is clear that there is a movement in L'Aquila - still in the dawn, and then do not fit easily into preconceived labels - which, by contrast, contradictions , errors, ingenuity and practical problems, has the difficult task and required a process of reappropriation of the fundamental right of citizens to participate in the reconstruction. It seems positive that outlines some convergence on the idea of \u200b\u200brebuilding that would genuinely sustainable and aimed at long-term welfare of the city (not the immediate benefit of external actors). I take the view that this understanding is vital to L'Aquila in that it expresses an inalienable right: the city can not be reconstructed from a program primarily heterocentric or elitist, but it needs first and foremost a process of self-representation resulting from a shared vision within which to give meaning to a founding event (like the disaster that struck us) to collectively translate into practices appropriate to the specific way of living of those in place. For this I see in this fervor for participation in an overall positive event for the city, and also have an example for the nation. Then, as I'm concerned, all is not to say demand illusory and ideological reconstructions only "from below", but it means rejecting the ouster of the reconstruction of citizenship, claiming a right actually binding to the negotiation decision-making with local and national institutions .
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRSBJLuOrZM&feature=related , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnOo9QwbZ24&feature=related .
[2] The episode can be viewed in full on http://www.rai.tv/dl/RaiTV/programmi/media/ContentItem-00a2a61f-cea7 -4746-a52b-9294466a9ef3.html? p = 0.
[4] Victorian Abate So, the sending of "Door to door," replies one of the many accusations of partisanship that is given to the program: http://www.ilpuntoazzurro.it/ notizie.php? a = d & i = 516 .
0 comments:
Post a Comment